[Internet Archaeology]

Guidelines for Referees

The following set of guidelines have been compiled to help guide referees who have been asked to comment on an article submitted to Internet Archaeology, but potential authors might also find it useful to read through this advice.

Internet Archaeology is interested in publishing high quality content that is accurate, original and rigorous. As a referee, you are essential to our existence as a quality journal of record. Without your valuable time and effort, archaeological reports and articles would not be adequately evaluated. We appreciate your help and always welcome suggestions for improvement of our peer-review process. We know that good refereeing is hard work and it is essential for us. Thank you for letting us impose on you!

Referee comments are required to be sent back to Internet Archaeology by email. Please also refer to our editorial policy but contact the Editor if you have any queries.

Authors have been assured of the privacy and security of their submitted work, so we ask that you do not refer to the work that the draft describes before it has been published. We hope that you will adopt a positive, impartial attitude towards the article you are assessing but if you feel you are unable to judge a submission impartially, please inform us stating why. Deadlines for referee reports are arranged individually with the editor.

Your Report

Please prepare a free text report on the article you have been asked to assess (should you wish to use them, some topics to consider are suggested in the list below). Your comments should be straightforward, constructive and in sufficient detail for the author to follow your line of reasoning, and where applicable, suggestions for major revisions should be included. Detailed comments/points/suggestions can also be inserted using the Comment feature in the document you are sent/given access to. If you are requesting revisions, please be as explicit as possible, and distinguish those you consider necessary from those you consider desirable but optional. If you deem necessary, your report may be divided up into two sections: comments for transmission to the author and comments for the editor only. If you choose to do this, please mark your sections clearly.

The draft you receive may not be in the journal housestyle, but you are not expected to correct basic language or grammatical errors. However, errors which a copy editor may not recognise e.g. misspellings of site names/species, incorrect or outmoded terminology, inappropriate jargon etc. should be pointed out.

You may use the following questions to structure your response

Feel free to provide any further comments that may be of help to the author and/or editor.

Until you have been notified that we have received your comments, please retain a copy of your assessment and please contact the Editor at any stage in the process if you have any queries.


only search Internet Archaeology

 HOME   ABOUT   FOR AUTHORS 

Internet Archaeology is an open access journal. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI.
University of York legal statements | Terms and Conditions | Citing IA