PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

List of Figures

Figure 1: A schematic diagram of excavated areas at Elms Farm, Heybridge (after Atkinson and Preston 1998, 93)

Figure 2a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 50 - 15 BC: areas

Figure 2b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 50 - 15 BC: pottery

Figure 3a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 15 BC - AD 20: areas

Figure 3b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 15 BC - AD 20: pottery

Figure 4a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 20 - 55: areas

Figure 4b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 20 - 55: pottery

Figure 5a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 55 - 80: areas

Figure 5b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 55 - 80: pottery

Figure 6a:Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 80 -125: areas

Figure 6b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 80 -125: pottery

Figure 7a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 125 - 170: areas

Figure 7b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 125 - 170: pottery

Figure 8a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 170 - 210: areas

Figure 8b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 170 - 210: areas

Figure 9a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 50 - 15 BC: assemblages

Figure 9b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 50 - 15 BC: pottery

Figure 10a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 15 BC - AD 20: assemblages

Figure 10b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 15 BC - AD 20: pottery

Figure 11a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 20 - 55: assemblages

Figure 11b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 20 - 55: pottery

Figure 12a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 55 - 80: assemblages

Figure 12b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 55 - 80: pottery

Figure 13a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 80 - 125: assemblages

Figure 13b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 80 - 125: pottery

Figure 14a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 125 - 170: assemblages

Figure 14b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 125 - 170: pottery

Figure 15a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 170 - 210: assemblages

Figure 15b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 170 - 210: pottery

Figure 16a: Correspondence analysis of pottery consumption by ceramic phase at Elms Farm, Heybridge: phases

Figure 16b: Correspondence analysis of pottery consumption by ceramic phase at Elms Farm, Heybridge: pottery


 PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

© Internet Archaeology URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue21/2/tof.html
Last updated: Tue May 08 2007