Figure 1a: General plan of Hut Platform 4, after Drewett (Drewett 1982, 326). © Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, reproduced by permission.
Figure 1b: Identification of spaces within the hut platform, produced from Drewett's figs 5 and 9 (Drewett 1982, 327, 335). The semi-elliptical spaces within the huts represent the areas illuminated by natural light through the doors, which includes the spaces within the porches. © Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, reproduced by permission.
Figure 2: Codes for parts of the site (see Quantifying Spaces, step 9).
Figure 3: Drewett's reconstruction of Hut Platform 4 (Drewett 1982, plate 30). © Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, reproduced by permission.
Figure 4: A 'U' bugle sheep yard. Note the race on the left of the image, and the tapering of the space created by the fences leading into this (the forcing pen) (NSWDPI 2004a).
Figure 5: Plan of 'U' bugle sheep yard. (NSWDPI 2004b)
Figure 6: Possible arrangement of fence lines and gates at HP4 (after Drewett 1982, 327, 335). Note the similarities in the arrangement of space between the northern area of this arrangement and the 'U' bugle yard in Figure 5. Arrows and letters shown in blue represent the possible use of space as stockyards for sheep. H - holding area; F - forcing yard; W - working race; D - drafting race; R - receiving yard. © Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, reproduced by permission.
Figure 7a: Image showing order of control values for the spaces in my new interpretation of HP4.
Figure 7b: Image showing order of real relative asymmetry values for the spaces in my new interpretation of HP4. In both cases, darker shading indicates a higher value, lighter shading a lower value. It should be remembered that high control values represent spaces with strong control, whereas high RRA values represent spaces with a low level of integration into the system.
Figure 8: Scatter graph plotting positions of each space in rankings of control values and integration (RRA) against one another.
Figure 9: Image showing presence availability of spaces. Green represents the highest level of presence availability, yellow the next highest, with a progression towards red as the level of presence availability decreases.
Figure 10: Identification of separate systems on the permeability map of my new interpretation. Spaces in the main system are shown in red, those in the stockyard sub-system in blue, and shared spaces are coloured green.
© Internet Archaeology/Author(s)
University of York legal statements | Terms and Conditions
| File last updated: Wed Dec 7 2011