BACK   NEXT   SUMMARY   CONTENTS   ISSUE   HOME 

An Ancient Egyptian Wig: Construction and Reconstruction

Joann FletcherORCID logo* and Filippo Salamone

* Corresponding author: Department of Archaeology, King's Manor, University of York, YO1 7EP, UK.
Email: joann.fletcher@york.ac.uk

Cite this as: Fletcher, J. and Salamone, F. (2016) An Ancient Egyptian Wig: Construction and Reconstruction, Internet Archaeology 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.42.6.3

Although only relatively recently the subject of serious study, hair and its grooming can be one of the best ways of gaining an understanding of past peoples. This is certainly the case with ancient Egypt, where forms of adornment and grooming regimes provide an alternative means of studying those beyond the 1% literate elite, and where its dry climate preserves human remains whether artificially mummified or not. Often present is the hair, which Egyptians throughout society treated in a wide variety of ways for a wide variety of reasons. The way in which the resulting styles were then portrayed in artistic representations can be used to establish a chronology for the whole pharaonic period (c.3100-30 BC). This can then be compared to the various types of hair remains to have survived (Fletcher 1995).

As well as styling their own hair, the Egyptians also employed false hair. The earliest known example is a set of hair extensions from c.3400 BC, discovered in a plundered female burial at Hierakonpolis (Fletcher 1998). Although such braids were subsequently attached to the natural hair of women and occasionally men throughout society, complete wigs were significantly more time-consuming to create and therefore more costly, with their use restricted largely to the elite.

Predominantly worn by elite men and women as status markers within Egypt's well-defined social hierarchy, wigs catered for the desire for elaborate hairstyles while serving a practical purpose. A wig shielded the shaven or cropped head from the harmful effects of direct sunlight and, unlike a head scarf, its mesh-like foundation base allowed body heat to escape. The practice also maintained high levels of cleanliness, the reduction or removal of the natural hair reducing the incidence of head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) whose need to live close to the scalp's blood supply as their food source was countered by a wig that could be removed at any time (Fletcher 1994). Wigs therefore became a way of maintaining ritual purity with a temple environment, in which the 'Egyptian priests shave their bodies all over every other day to guard against the presence of lice, or anything else equally unpleasant, while they are about their religious duties' (Herodotus II.36, trans. de Selincourt 1954, 143).

As the subject of study since 1986, with all known examples of wigs, extensions and hairpieces recorded (Fletcher 1995, 353-424), the majority of wigs are now housed in the Egyptian Museum Cairo (Lucas 1930). Yet one of the most intact examples is in the British Museum (Figure 1), having been obtained prior to 1835 on the West Bank of Thebes (modern Luxor). Although sometimes described as a 'woman's wig' (e.g. Freed 1982, 196), it is in fact set in the 'double' or 'duplex' style typical for male officials during the 14th century BC, with its two separate sections of curls and plaits (Fletcher 1994, 33; for a typical style of 'woman's wig', see Buckley and Fletcher this issue).

Figure 1
Figure 1: Wig of an 18th dynasty male official from Thebes (British Museum EA.2560). Image credit: J. Fletcher/Ancient Adornments Project.

Although the wig is extremely fragile and cannot be removed from the wooden display mount to which it was fastened in the 19th century, detailed examination by a professional wigmaker in 1975 nonetheless revealed construction methods as sophisticated as modern examples (Cox 1977, 70). Previous suggestions that a wig of this size (circumference 59.69cm) could be heavy enough to cause parietal thinning of the skull (Smith 2000, 36) therefore seemed unlikely, so when the wig was first examined by the authors in 1987, its weight was calculated at between 0.5kg and 1kg, revealing it was also as light as modern counterparts (Fletcher 1995, 386, 397).

Following a second, more detailed, study by the authors in 2008, an exact replica of the wig in its original condition was created as part of the 'Ancient Adornments Project' (Fletcher 2015, 69). With no evidence of any interior padding with palm fibres or grass noted in later examples, nor the 'sheep's wool' (British Museum 1922, 264) referred to in early editions of the museum's guide book, the British Museum wig was constructed entirely of human hair (Cox 1977, 67). As an expensive commodity in Egypt's barter economy, hair was listed alongside gold and incense in ancient accounts' lists (Griffith 1898, 39, 48-50), and no doubt obtained from those wishing to exchange their hair as part of a trading transaction. In the case of the British Museum wig, some of the hair may also have been supplied by the owner of the wig.

Once a sufficient amount had been collected, the hair would have been cleaned and then separated into several hundred individual lengths containing approximately 400 hairs in each length (Cox 1977, 69). The wig was then manufactured on a wooden wig mount, again very similar to modern examples. Firstly the foundation base was created using multiple lengths of plaited hair laid horizontally and vertically to create the characteristic mesh, each length fixed in place by a combination of either knotting or folding the plaits back on themselves. The mesh was further secured with an application of a 'setting' mixture made of two-thirds beeswax and one-third imported conifer resin. Warmed prior to application it then set hard, the melting point of beeswax of between 140��F and 149��F (60��-65��C) making it capable of withstanding even Egypt's extreme climate (Cox 1977, 69-70).

To anchor the subsequent lengths of hair to this mesh foundation, an inch of the root end of each length was looped around the horizontal mesh and pressed between thumb and forefinger against the waxed hair stem. A 'sub-strand' of approximately 15 hairs was then wound around the hair stem to secure it further (Cox 1977, 69).

Figure 2
Figure 2: Reconstructing the wig as the plaited underpanel is attached to the reticulated mesh base. Image credit: F. Salamone/Ancient Adornments Project.

With 'several hundred' (Cox 1977, 67) lengths of hair originally ranging from approximately 30 to 38cm in length attached at the back and sides of the mesh base from ear to ear, these would have been plaited individually once in situ to create the underpanel (although the reconstruction employed pre-plaited lengths of hair for reasons of economy). The remaining lengths of naturally wavy hair of approximately 18cm in length could then be added to create the top section, each of which was then individually styled to create annular 'stand-up' curls (approximately 1.27cm in diameter).

Figure 3
Figure 3: Historical hairstylist Filippo Salamone recreating the British Museum wig as part of the 'Ancient Adornments Project' Image credit: Ancient Adornments Project/Firefly.

The recreation of the wig took a professional hairstylist and wigmaker approximately 200 hours or around one month to complete, which would obviously have been even greater if the plaits had been styled once attached to the mesh as in the case of the original (Figures 2-3). Known to have been produced in wig-making workshops (Laskowska-Kusztal 1978) and within the hairdressing facilities of temples, such high-status headwear was worn on a regular basis by society's male and female elite for over two thousand years and was clearly of great importance. It is therefore time scholars paid it as much attention as the ancients themselves so obviously did.

Bibliography

British Museum 1922 British Museum Guide to the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Egyptian Rooms, and the Coptic Room, London: The Trustees.

Cox, J.S. 1977 'The construction of an ancient Egyptian wig (c.1400 BC) in the British Museum', Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 63. 67-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3856302

Fletcher, J. 1994 'A tale of wigs, hair and lice', Egyptian Archaeology 5. 31-33.

Fletcher, J. 1995 Ancient Egyptian Hair: a study in style, form and function. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.

Fletcher, J. 1998 'The secrets of the locks unravelled', Nekhen News: Newsletter of the Friends of Nekhen 10. 4.

Fletcher, J. 2002 'Ancient Egyptian hair and wigs', The Ostracon: Journal of the Egyptian Study Society 13(2). 2-8. http://egyptstudy.org/ostracon/vol13_2.pdf

Fletcher, J. 2005 'The Decorated Body in Ancient Egypt: hairstyles, cosmetics and tattoos', in L. Cleland, M. Harlow and L. Llewellyn-Jones (eds), The Clothed Body in the Ancient World, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 3-13.

Fletcher, J. 2015 'The most democratic form of adornment: hair and wigs in Ancient Egypt', El-Rawi: Egypt's Heritage Review 7. 66-71.

Freed, R. 1982 'Wigs and hair accessories', in E. Brovarski, S. Doll and R. Freed (eds), Egypt's Golden Age: The Art of Living in the New Kingdom 1558-1985 BC, Boston: The Museum Of Fine Arts. 196-198.

Griffith, F.L. 1898 Hieratic Papyri from Kahun and Gurob, London: Bernard Quaritch.

Herodotus (trans. de Sélincourt, A.) 1954 The Histories, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Laskowska-Kusztal, E. 1978 'Un Atelier de perruquier à Deir el-Bahari', Etudes et Travaux 10, 84-120.

Lucas, A. 1930 'Ancient Egyptian wigs', Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte 30. 190-196.

Smith, G.E. 2000 The Royal Mummies. London: Duckworth.

Comments

Add a Comment

  • Internet Archaeology will never publish or share your email with anyone.
    Required fields are marked *.
  • Receive emails when this thread is updated

 BACK   NEXT   SUMMARY   CONTENTS   ISSUE   HOME 

Internet Archaeology is an open access journal. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.

University of York legal statements