TABLES
CONTENTS

Table 144. Pig: Results of t-tests on biometric data from Elms Farm, Heybridge, Essex.

EF = Elms Farm

N = not significant

*= significant at the 95% confidance interval

**= significant at the 99% confidence interval.
Measurement | Site/s | Comparison between: | T value | Probability | Significance |

Tooth Log Ratios | EF | Periods 2 and 3 | -0.416 | 0.678 | N |

EF | Periods 3 and 4 | -4.056 | 0.0001 | ** |

EF | Periods 4 and 4-5 | 2.121 | 0.0368 | * |

EF | Periods 4-5 and 5-6 | -0.808 | 0.4217 | N |

EF | Periods 3 and 5-6 | -2.384 | 0.0184 | * |

EF | Periods 3 and 4-5 | -1.259 | 0.2105 | N |

EF | Periods 4 and 5-6 | 1.168 | 0.2454 | N |

Post-cranial Log Ratios | EF | Periods 2 and 4 | -4.778 | 0 | ** |

EF | Periods 4-5 and 5-6 | 0.866 | 0.3947 | N |

Lincoln v. EF | 4th C and Period 2 | 1.03 | 0.3072 | N |

Lincoln v. EF | 4th C and Period 5-6 | 5.128 | 0 | ** |