Internet Archaeol. 14. PUNS summary. Table of Figures

List of Figures

Figures in brackets indicate the original references in the full PUNS report

Figure 1 Numbers of responses by country/region (4.6)
Figure 2 Bar chart showing the types of archaeological publication to which respondents have directly contributed (4.11)
Figure 3 Bar chart showing how useful respondents find various sources of information in maintaining an overview of work in their fields (4.12)
Figure 4 Graph showing regional/national variation in proportion of respondents who regard summary publications, SMRs/NMRs, journals, and syntheses as 'very useful' sources for maintaining an overview of recent work in their fields (4.13)
Figure 5 Graph showing responses by nation/region to the question 'Do you feel that there is relevant information being produced in your field(s)? of study that you are unaware of?'(4.14)
Figure 6 Bar chart showing respondents' preferred means of obtaining archaeological publications ranked from 'most important' (4.15)
Figure 7 Comparison of responses to the question 'In the last 6 months, how often have you used the following types of archaeological publication?'(4.21)
Figure 8 Graph showing frequent use of various types of publication by constituency (4.22)
Figure 9 Bar chart showing number of fieldwork publications respondents have read during the 12 months prior to the survey (4.23)
Figure 10 Graph showing variation in use of published fieldwork reports across selected constituencies (4.24)
Figure 11 Graph showing variation in use of 'grey literature' fieldwork reports across selected constituencies (4.25)
Figure 12 Graph showing the frequency of use of various typical components of fieldwork publications (4.26)
Figure 13 Graph showing purpose of use of fieldwork publications (4.31)
Figure 14 Graph showing general perceptions of whether fieldwork publications provide all the information that users need (4.32)
Figure 15 Graph showing frequency of critical assessment of the interpretations presented in fieldwork publications on the basis of accounts of the archaeological evidence (4.33)
Figure 16 Graph showing frequency with which respondents follow up use of fieldwork reports by consulting project archives (4.34)
Figure 17 Graph comparing extent to which different constituencies follow up use of fieldwork publications with consultation of the archives (4.35)
Figure 18 Graph showing the elements that respondents would like to see in a revised system (4.38)
Figure 19 Graph showing responses to being asked whether there is an inadequate relationship between fieldwork publications and syntheses of archaeological knowledge (4.43)
Figure 20 Graph showing respondents' views on the purposes of publishing fieldwork projects (4.39)
Figure 21 Graph showing respondents' views on the type of publication media they would like to see being used for different types of archaeological publication (4.50)