PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

3.1. To what extent did shellfish consumption change through time? (continued)

The following pie charts show the MNI figures for column 7738.

Figure 6: Pie charts showing species representation MNI throughout Krabbesholm column 7738 (1=latest 16=earliest).

Layer 1 Layer 2  Layer 3  Layer 4  Layer 5  Layer 6 Layer 7  Layer 8  Layer 9 Layer 10  Layer 11  Layer 12  Layer 13  Layer 14  Layer 15  Layer 16 

Reset

Select a layer from 1 to 16.

In the Mesolithic layers 17 and 16 in column 7737 oysters are by far the most abundant species with cockle numbers being insignificant. Through the Early Neolithic layers dominance fluctuates between oysters, cockles and mussels. The later Early Neolithic, shown in the lowest level in column 7738 there is a significant change to mussel dominance. From layer 11 upward, which includes both Early and Middle Neolithic layers, periwinkles become the most abundant species. There is therefore strong evidence that shoreline exploitation patterns changed from an earlier use of the shallow sea to a later predominance of rocky shore exploitation (see Figure 7 and Figure 8).

Figure7: Shoreline collection areas implied by the molluscs at Krabbesholm 7737.
Figure 7: Shoreline collection areas implied by the molluscs at Krabbesholm 7737.

Figure 8: Shoreline collection areas implied by the molluscs at Krabbesholm 7738
Figure 8: Shoreline collection areas implied by the molluscs at Krabbesholm 7738

The Norsminde layers show a completely different pattern (see Figure 9), with cockles being most abundant in all except layer 8 where oyster abundance is slightly larger than cockles. Oysters are the second most abundant species in the Mesolithic layers 10 to 7 but their abundance decreases dramatically throughout the Neolithic layers 6 to 1. In general mussel then becomes the second most abundant species in the Early Neolithic. In the uppermost layers of the Middle Neolithic deposit represented by layers 3 to 1 periwinkles start to become more important.

Layer 1Layer 1 Layer 2Layer 2
Layer 3Layer 3 Layer 4Layer 4
Layer 5Layer 5 Layer 6Layer 6
Layer 7Layer 7 Layer 8Layer 8
Layer 9Layer 9 Layer 10Layer 10
Figure 9: Pie charts showing species representation based on the MNI through the Norsminde kitchen midden. (1=latest 16=earliest).

The Norsminde Pie charts show that both the shallow sea and sandy shore were exploited in the Mesolithic but in the Neolithic there is a shift with shallow sea exploitation rapidly disappearing. Although rocky shore species do appear it is not until the latest layers that they appear in significant numbers (see Figure 10).

Figure10: Shoreline collection areas implied by the molluscs at Norsminde
Figure10: Shoreline collection areas implied by the molluscs at Norsminde

On both sites there are changes in shellfish species' abundance throughout the layers with oysters appearing in higher numbers in the Mesolithic layers at both sites. However at Krabbesholm 11 Neolithic layers were still dominated by oysters. There is clear evidence that shellfish collection and therefore consumption did change overtime at these two sites.


 PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

© Internet Archaeology URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue22/5/quest1_1.html
Last updated: Tues Oct 2 2007