Several noteworthy instances of samian ware recovered in association with formal religious foci can be outlined here. They imply levels of use of samian in and around religious structures and space, suggesting that in some cases it will have been employed in various religious actions.
Sherds from nine samian vessels were recovered from the area. They were reported by Brian Hartley, all being examples of Central Gaulish ware that would normally be dated to the 2nd century (Hartley 1963). It is possible that some might derive from activity or occupation preceding the identified shrines, but this is not necessarily so, as the currency of some Central Gaulish items extended into the 3rd century AD (cf. Section 5.8); an earlier phase in the 2nd century might also have had a religious purpose, since a radical change in function is unlikely at the same location. All nine vessels were plain forms: a Drag. 33 cup from metalling outside the polygonal shrine, a Drag. 31R bowl from a pit also outside this shrine, a Drag. 31 dish from the drainage gulley outside the circular shrine, plus two examples of Drag. 31, two of Drag. 31R and two examples of Drag. 33 from overlying layers (Hartley 1963). None of the find-spots/contexts of these samian items seems especially sensitive or symbolic. There were no instances of stratified samian from deposits within the shrines, whereas other material types were present in such contexts, evidently being votive items.
All of the vessels with surviving foot-rings (three) showed examples of 'owner's marks' (Hartley 1963), these marks being within the area defined by the footring; significantly, Ferris noted in the case of the Orton's Pasture shrine (cf. above) that there was a correlation between samian with 'owner's markers' and selected pottery deposition (Ferris et al. 2000, 77).
Hence at Brigstock samian seems likely to have been an accoutrement used in and around the special activities at this site. Apparently, though, it did not have a major role in activities at the shrines. The modest amount of samian may be a function of the chronology of the shrines, beginning as they apparently do, after the main floruit of samian exportation to Britain. There is an indication of an unusually frequent marking of vessels for whatever reason.
This review of samian at various formal religious sites has shown that samian is, in some instances at least, such as at Rocester and Great Chesterford, prominent at such sites, not excluded from them. The nature of the finds of samian from Carrawburgh, Brigstock and Stonea indicates that they were being selected and/or employed in specific ways relating to symbolism or ritual within the locus of these religious sites.
© Internet Archaeology
URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue17/1/12.2.1.html
Last updated: Mon Mar 7 2005