Mini journal logo  Home Issue Contents All Issues

Behind Closed Doors: The Human Remains Trade within Private Facebook Groups

Shawn Graham, Katherine Davidson and Damien Huffer

Cite this as: Graham, S., Davidson, K. and Huffer. D. 2024 Behind Closed Doors: The Human Remains Trade within Private Facebook Groups, Internet Archaeology 67. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.14

Summary

The existence of a thriving trade in human remains online is facilitated by social media platforms. While much of this trade is conducted in fully public forums such as e-commerce platforms, the retail website of bricks-and-mortar stores, public personal and business pages on social media, etc., there also exist numerous private groups using the affordances of various social media platforms to buy, sell, and share photographs of human remains. This article describes a case study of four private Facebook groups featuring people who buy and sell human remains, to explore how the discourses of the trade may be different when not made in public. Using a close-reading approach on the text of posts and threaded conversations, and associated visual similarity analysis of the accompanying photographs, we observe, among other things, a strikingly 'more professional' approach, shibboleths and patterns of behaviour that serve to create group identities. We analyse posts made over a seven-week period across the selected private groups in the run-up to the 2023 holiday season. Given the issues of privacy raised by studying private groups, we also experiment with a locally hosted large language model to see if it could classify discourses meaningfully without the intervention of a researcher having to read the original posts. This case study might also serve as a model for other kinds of research investigating the reception of various archaeological topics that might be discussed and understood differently in private versus public venues.

  • Google Scholar
  • Keywords: Social media, human remains, computer vision, illicit trafficking, heritage crime, reception studies
  • Accepted: 16 May 2024. Published: 17 June 2024
  • Funding: This article draws on research supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
  • PDF download (main article text only)

Corresponding author: Shawn GrahamORCID logo
ShawnGraham@cunet.carleton.ca
Carleton University

Katherine DavidsonORCID logo
Carleton University

Damien HufferORCID logo
University of Queensland

Full text

Figure 1: Facebook Group 1, tags connected to tags by virtue of appearing in the same conversations. The thicker the lines, the greater the number of co-occurrences. Tags that appear as most central are scaled accordingly larger. Colour indicates 'modules' or subgroups based on similarity of interlinkages

Figure 2: Facebook Group 2 tags connected to tags by virtue of appearing in the same conversations. The thicker the lines, the greater the number of co-occurrences. Tags that appear as most central are scaled accordingly larger. Colour indicates 'modules' or subgroups based on similarity of interlinkages

Figure 3: Facebook Group 3 tags connected to tags by virtue of appearing in the same conversations. The thicker the lines, the greater the number of co-occurrences. Tags that appear as most central are scaled accordingly larger. Colour indicates 'modules' or subgroups based on similarity of interlinkages

Figure 4: Facebook Group 4 tags connected to tags by virtue of appearing in the same conversations. The thicker the lines, the greater the number of co-occurrences. Tags that appear as most central are scaled accordingly larger. Colour indicates 'modules' or subgroups based on similarity of interlinkages

Figure 5: Programming a visual similarity workflow, as represented by the Visual Programming widget on Orange Data Mining

Figure 6: Visual similarity of photographs in posts from the Facebook groups examined in this study, represented via multi-dimensional scaling. Connecting lines represent similarity above a threshold which in this visualisation may be controlled by a slider; the user can then click on data points to manually inspect multiple images

Table 1: Themes identified across all posts collected, with frequency represented in the 'Count' column

Al-Azm, A. and Paul, K.A. 2019 Facebook's Black Market in Antiquities: Trafficking, Terrorism, and War Crimes, ATHAR Project. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e3a7fb845f8c668df48d437/t/5e4e58ef0caa64606351a54b/1582192944742/ATHAR-FB-Report-June-2019.pdf

Baumer, E.P.S., Mimno, D., Guha, S., Quan, E. and Gay, G.K. 2017 'Comparing grounded theory and topic modeling: extreme divergence or unlikely convergence?, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68(6), 1397-1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23786

Brandsen, A. 2024 'Archaeology specific BERT models for English, German, and Dutch (Version 4)', Paper given at Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference 2023 (CAA2023), Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10610882

Breda, E. 2023 Bone Collectors: Personhood and Appeal in the Sale and Trade of Human Skeletal Remains on Facebook, Unpublished Masters thesis, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida.

Charmaz, K. 2017 'The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry', Qualitative Inquiry 23(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416657105

Davidson, K., Graham, S. and Huffer, D. 2021 'Exploring taste formation and performance in the illicit trade of human remains on Instagram' in N. Oosterman and D. Yates (eds) Crime and Art: Sociological and Criminological Perspectives of Crimes in the Art World, Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market, Cham: Springer International Publishing. 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_3

Davidson, K., Graham, S. and Huffer, D. 2024 'A protocol for when social media goes private: studying archaeological or heritage discourses in closed Facebook groups', Internet Archaeology 67. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.11

Demsar, J., Curk, T., Erjavec, A., Gorup, C., Hocevar, T., Milutinovic, M., Mozina, M., Polajnar, M., Toplak, M., Staric, A., Stajdohar, M., Umek, L., Zagar, L., Zbontar, J., Zitnik, M. and Zupan, B. 2013 'Orange: Data Mining Toolbox in Python', Journal of Machine Learning Research 14, 2349-2353. http://jmlr.org/papers/v14/demsar13a.html

Dillon, D.R. 2012 'Grounded theory and qualitative research' in C.A. Chapelle (ed) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1st edition, Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0486

Dundler, L. 2021 '#antiquitiesdealers' in N. Oosterman and D. Yates (eds) Crime and Art: Sociological and Criminological Perspectives of Crimes in the Art World, Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market, Cham: Springer International Publishing. 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_4

Fairly Trained 2024 'Announcing our newly certified models (including LLM & speech) and new supporters', Fairly Trained [blog], 20 March 2024, https://www.fairlytrained.org/blog/newly-certified-models-march-24

Google 2024 'Advanced Guide to Inception 3', Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/tpu/docs/inception-v3-advanced

Graham, S. 2023 'Qualitative analysis of social media posts - a workflow from OCR to Obsidian', X-Lab [blog], 15 December 2023. https://carleton.ca/xlab/2023/qualitative-analysis-of-social-media-posts-a-workflow-from-ocr-to-obsidian/

Graham, S. 2024 'The behaviour space(s) of Large Language Models', X-Lab [blog], 9 April 2024. https://carleton.ca/xlab/2024/the-behaviour-spaces-of-large-language-models/

Graham, S. and Huffer, D. 2020 'Reproducibility, replicability, and revisiting the Insta-Dead and the human remains trade', Internet Archaeology 55. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.55.11

Graham, S., Huffer, D. and Blackadar, J. 2020a 'Towards a digital sensorial archaeology as an experiment in distant viewing of the trade in human remains on Instagram', Heritage 2020 3(2), Art and Antiquities Crime special issue, 208-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020013

Graham, S., Lane, A., Huffer, D. and Angourakis, A. 2020b 'Towards a method for discerning sources of supply within the human remains trade via patterns of visual dissimilarity and computer vision', Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 3(1), 253-68. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.59

Graham, S., Huffer, D. and Simons, J. 2022 'When TikTok discovered the human remains trade: a case study', Open Archaeology 8(1), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0235

Graham, S., Yates, D. and El-Roby, A. 2023 'Investigating antiquities trafficking with Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT)-3 enabled knowledge graphs: a case study', Open Research Europe 3, 100. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16003.1

Huffer, D. and Graham, S. 2017 'The Insta-Dead: the rhetoric of the human remains trade on Instagram', Internet Archaeology 45. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.45.5

Huffer, D. and Graham, S. 2018 'Fleshing out the bones: studying the human remains trade with Tensorflow and Inception', Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.8.

Huffer, D. and Graham, S. 2023 These Were People Once: The Online Trade In Human Remains, and Why It Matters, New York: Berghahn.

Huffer, D., Wood, C. and Graham, S. 2019 'What the machine saw: some questions on the ethics of computer vision and machine learning to investigate human remains trafficking', Internet Archaeology 52. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.52.5

Huffer, D., Guerreiro, A., and Graham, S. 2021 'Osteological assessment of a seized shipment of modified human crania: Implications for Dayak cultural heritage preservation and the global human remains trade', Journal of Borneo-Kalimantan 7(1), 67-93.

Huffer, D., Simons, J., Brughmans, T. and Graham, S. 2022 'Alleen voor studiedoeleinden (For study purposes only): The human remains trade on Marktplaats.nl', Anthropologica et Praehistorica 131, 179-94. https://doi.org/10.57937/ap.2022.008

Knibbs, K. 2024 'Here's proof you can train an AI Model without slurping copyrighted content', Wired, 20 March 2024. https://www.wired.com/story/proof-you-can-train-ai-without-slurping-copyrighted-content/

273 Ventures and Kelvin Legal Data OS 2024 'Kl3m.Ai - the cleanest LLM in the world', KL3M, https://kl3m.ai

Mistral AI, 2023 'Announcing Mistral 7B The best 7B model to date, Apache 2.0', Mistral AI, 27 September 2023. https://mistral.ai/news/announcing-mistral-7b/

Moore, J., Magee, S., Gamreklidze, E. and Kowalewski, J. 2019 'Social media mourning: using grounded theory to explore how people grieve on social networking sites', OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 79(3), 231-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817709691

Murphy, R.J.A. 2021 'An integrated qualitative analysis environment with Obsidian', Fulcra Design [Blog], 13 August 2021. https://fulcra.design/Posts/An-Integrated-Qualitative-Analysis-Environment-with-Obsidian/

Nelson, L.K. 2020 'Computational grounded theory: a methodological framework', Sociological Methods and Research 49(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703

Tri-Council: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 2022 Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html

Willison, S. 2023 'LLM A CLI utility and Python library for interacting with Large Language Models, both via remote APIs and models that can be installed and run on your own machine'. https://llm.datasette.io/en/stable/ Version 0.13.1

Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.

Terms and Conditions | Legal Statements | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Citing Internet Archaeology

Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.