Mini journal logo  Home Issue Contents All Issues

Preserving the Past in the Plough Zone Together: Hobby metal detecting in Innlandet County as a case of good practice within the Norwegian legal framework

Caroline Fredriksen, Anne Engesveen, Kjetil Skare, May-Tove Smiseth and Lars Pilø

Cite this as: Fredriksen, C., Engesveen, A., Skare, E., Smiseth, M-T. and Pilø, L. 2025 Preserving the past in the plough zone together: Hobby metal detecting in Innlandet County as a case of good practice within the Norwegian legal framework, Internet Archaeology 68. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.68.2

Summary

A collage of some of the most important detector finds from Innlandet County
A collage of some of the most important detector finds from Innlandet County

This article presents and discusses the practice of Norwegian metal detecting from the perspective of Innlandet County. The authors perceive hobby metal detecting in Norway as an essentially good thing even with its downsides, and believe that a collaborative approach is the best way to preserve the past in the plough zone. The case study of the Innlandet practice is based on first-hand experiences of the Innlandet archaeologists. We present how the Innlandet practice has emerged, how archaeologists communicate with detectorists, and how the archaeological context of finds in the plough zone is understood. In our opinion, general in situ protection in the plough zone is the 'worst practice' within the Norwegian legal framework.

  • Google Scholar
  • Keywords: archaeology, metal detecting, cultural heritage law, Norway, Innlandet County, citizen science, guidelines, best practice, dialogue, nighthawking
  • Accepted: October 2024. Published: June 2025
  • Funding: This article was funded by the Joint Committee for Nordic research councils in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NOS-HS) grant no 335213 for the project From Treasure Hunters to Citizen Scientists: metal-detecting and archaeological heritage in the Nordic region.
  • PDF download (main article text only)

Corresponding author: Caroline FredriksenORCID logo
caroline.fredriksen@ntnu.no
Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Anne EngesveenORCID logo

Kjetil SkareORCID logo

May-Tove SmisethORCID logo

Lars PiløORCID logo

Full text

Figure 1: The protection status of sites recorded by metal detecting in Norwegian Counties, 30.1.2020. Due to significant differences in numbers of finds per county, the percentage distribution of each protection status label is given. Image credit: Caroline Fredriksen

Figure 2: A map of Norway with Innlandet County marked. Image credit: Caroline Fredriksen

Figure 3: Number of finds per county in the Museum of Cultural History's jurisdiction. Being one of five University museums in Norway, its jurisdiction covers 5 out of 11 counties. Image credit: Caroline Fredriksen

Figure 4: The 2020 detector meeting in Innlandet, held on the historic Åker farm near Hamar. Photo: Anne Engesveen

Figure 5: A typical find assemblage found on the Herset farm, Hamar municipality, by detectorist Øivind Moe 2016-2023. The farm is first mentioned in historical sources in 1593. No known finds came from the farm prior to the detector search. The farm name suggests a Late Iron Age (550-1050 CE) origin, but there are three fragments of brooches and a buckle belonging to the Migration Period (350-550 CE) among the finds, suggesting an earlier date. Not to scale. Photos: Øivind Moe

Figure 6: Distribution map of the detector finds on Herset farm, Hamar municipality (seen in Figure 5). The detectorist searching the farm works in a mostly unsystematic fashion, and rarely digs iron signals. The low-lying areas to the south and east are damp, and the detectorist has not searched here. The finds are widely distributed in the fields with no clear chronological concentrations, the exception being three Viking Age finds near the farm road, but they are parts of the same trefoil brooch. Image credit: Lars Pilø

Figure 7: Refitting parts of a damaged buckle from around 600 CE (locations shown with red circles), found with a wide distribution in a field. Image credit: Lars Pilø

Figure 8: A collage of some of the most important detector finds from Innlandet County, found 2011-2022. Not to scale. From the top left corner: Flanged axe, Early Bronze Age (finder (F): Steen Agersø, photo (P): Freddy Arntsen); La Tène fibula, 1.-2. century BCE (F&P: Roger Mickelson); Gold berlock, 1.-2. century CE (F&P: Vegard Høystad Lunna) ;Roman denarius (Marcus Aurelius, 2nd century CE) (F&P: Frank Robert Ludvigsen) ; Gold fingerring, 3.-4. century CE, with a medieval inscription (F&P: Rune Thyregod Paulsen); Gold Bracteate, Migration Period (350-550 CE) (F&P: Terje Marken); Agraf button, Migration Period (F&P: Ola Andreas Vestby Sandlie); Domed brooch, Merovingian Period (AD 550-800) (F&P: Kenny Hansen); Frankian denarius (Charles the Bald), 9th century CE (F&P: Terje Staale Sande); Insular metalwork, VIking Age (F&P: Kenny Hansen); Patrice for a Hiddensee-type brooch, Viking Age (F&P: Hugo Falck); Rare type of domed brooch, Viking Age (F: Britt Annie Hoddø, P: Kenny Hansen); Dirhem, Viking Age (F&P: Tor Arne Tjernslien); Cross-/hammer-shaped pendant, Late Viking Ae/Early Medieval Period (F: Ole Harpøth, F: Kenny Hansen; Elaborate Urnes brooch, 11th-12th century (F&P: Kristian Thoresen); Limoges figurine, medieval (F&P: Vegard Høystad Lunna); Seal from a cloister in Denmark, medieval. (F&P: Kenny Hansen); Ring brooch in gold, medieval (F&P: Kenny Hansen)

Axelsen, I. 2021 What's the Deal with Old Things? An exploratory study of attitudes and practices towards certain old things among archaeologists and metal detectorists in Norway, PhD Thesis, University of Oslo.

Axelsen, I. and Fredriksen, C. 2024 'Organically grown archaeological databases and their “messiness”: hobby metal detecting in Norway', European Journal of Archaeology 27(3), 372-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2024.10

Christiansen, T.T. 2017 The Productive Limfjord Region in Perspective. A Study of Metal Detecting Sites and Socioeconomic Development in Denmark, AD 400-1150, PhD thesis, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University.

Christiansen, T.T. 2019 'Metal-detected Late Iron Age and early medieval brooches from the Limfjord Region, Northern Jutland: production, use, and loss', Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History 2, 3-41. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1297079&dswid=4103

Christiansen, T.T. 2020 'Exploring spatial patterns at 'Nørholm', a metal-rich site by the Limfjord, Northern Denmark: on metal detection, settlement history and the development of land exploitation', Danish Journal of Archaeology 9, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7146/dja.v9i0.114872

Dahle, K., Vemmestad, C.F. and Stavik, J. 2019 'Metallsøkerfunnsomgrunnlag for kunnskap og vern: En case-studie fra Sunndal - et knutepunkt i jernalder og middelalder', Primitive tider 21, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.5617/pt.7537

Dobat, A.S., Deckers, P., Heeren, S., Lewis, M., Thomas, S. and Wessman, A. 2020 'Towards a cooperative approach to hobby metal detecting: the European Public Finds Recording Network (EPFRN) vision statement', European Journal of Archaeology 23(2), 272-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2020.1

Fredriksen, C. 2019 'Pløyelagsfunn i skjæringspunktet mellom forskningspotensial og forvaltningsprioriteringer: Fokus og holdninger i diskusjonen om privat metallsøking i Norge', Primitive tider 21, 63-79. https://doi.org/10.5617/pt.7536

Fredriksen, C. 2021 'Pløyelagsfunn som automatisk fredete kulturminner: Kunnskapsdrevet forvaltning eller forvaltningsdrevet kunnskap?', Heimen 58(2), 136-51. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1894-3195-2021-02-03

Fredriksen, C. 2023 Funnet med metallsøker i dyrket mark': En relasjonell studie avnorskpraksisoverforprivatmetallsøking og pløyelagsfunnsomvitenskapeligkildemateriale, PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Fredriksen, C. and Stamnes, A.A. 2019 'Geofysiske undersøkelser og sosialt metallsøk på Løykja, Gnr. 41/6, Sunndal kommune, Møre og Romsdal', Trondheim: NTNU University Museum, Report 2019-23.

Gjerpe, L.E. 2014 'Kontinuitet i jernalderens bosetning: et utdatert postulat arvet fra 1814-generasjonen?', Viking 77, 55-78.

Glørstad, H. 2010 'Comments on quality from the ivory tower', Current Swedish Archaeology 18, 29-33. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2010.02

Grøtberg, U. and Sandodden, I.S. in prep 'The investigations at Gihle, Østre Toten', Innlandet County Council report.

Gundersen, J. 2019 'No room for good intentions? Private metal detecting and archaeological sites in the plow layer in Norway' in S. Campbell, L. White and S. Thomas (eds) Competing Values in Archaeological Heritage, Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 125-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94102-8_9

Gundersen, J., Rasmussen, J.M. and Lie, R.O. 2016 'Private metal detecting and archaeology in Norway', Open Archaeology 2(1), 160-70. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0012

Haldenby, D. and Richards, J. 2010 'Charting the effects of plough damage using metal-detected assemblages', Antiquity 84(326), 1151-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0006714

Henriksen, M.B. 2016 'Pløjelagsfund og formationsprocesser: Problemer ved fortolkning af detektorfund fra dyrket mark' in J. Martens and M. Ravn (eds) Pløyejord som kontekst: Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidlings, Portal forlag. 69-88.

Herteig, A.E. 1955 Bidrag til jernalderens busetningshistorie på Toten, Oslo.

Levick, P. and Sumnall, K. 2007 'Metal detecting rallies and landscape archaeology' in S. Worrell, G. Egan, J. Naylor, K. Leahy and M. Lewis (eds) A Decade of Discovery. Proceedings of the Portable Antiquities Scheme Conference 2007, Oxford: Archaeopress. 161-79.

Lov om kulturminner 1978 [Act Concerning the Cultural Heritage], (LOV-1978-06-09-50).

Løken, T., Pilø, L. and Hemdorff, O. 1996 Maskinell flateavdekking og utgravning av forhistoriske jordbruksboplasser. En metodisk innføring, AmS-Varia 26, Stavanger: Arkeologisk museum i Stavanger. https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/handle/11250/218839

Maixner, B. 2015 'Énlov - ulik forvaltningspolitikk. Om norskforvaltningspraksis rundt privat metallsøking i pløyejord og dens konsekvenser', Fornvännen 110(3), 201-13.

Maixner, B. 2020 'Connected by water, no matter how far: Viking Age central farms at the Trondheimsfjorden, Norway, as gateways between waterscapes and landscapes', Archäologische Informationen 43, 289-308. https://doi.org/10.11588/ai.2020.1.81416

McLean, L. and Richardson, A. 2010 'Early Anglo-Saxon Brooches in Southern England: The Contribution of the Portable Antiquities Scheme', in I S. Worrell, G. Egan, J. Naylor, K. Leahy and M. Lewis (ed) A Decade of Discovery. Proceedings of the Portable Antiquities Scheme conference 2007, BAR British Series 520, Oxford: Archaeopress. 161-171.

Meld. St. 16 (2019-2020) 'Nye mål i kulturmiljøpolitikken: Engasjement, bærekraft og mangfold', Klima- og miljødepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-16-20192020/id2697781/

Pettersen, A.M.H. 2022 Farin Vestir and Back: Social and Itinerary Perspectives on Insular Objects in Viking-Age Norway, PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Pilø, L. 2005 Bosted - urgård - enkeltgård. Ene analyse av premissene i den norske bosetningshistoriske forskningstradisjon på bakgrunn av bebyggelsesarkeologisk feltarbeid på Hedemarken, Oslo Archaeological Series 3, Oslo.

Pilø, L. 2007 'The settlement: fieldwork 1998-2003. Overview and method' in D. Skre (ed) Kaupang in Skiringssal. Excavations and Surveys at Kaupang and Huseby 1998-2003, The Kaupang Excavation Project,Vol. 1, Norske Oldfunn XXII, Aarhus Universitetsforlag. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/44083

Pilø, L., Finstad, E., Bronk Ramsey, C., Martinsen, J.R.P., Nesje, A., Solli, B., Wangen, V., Callanan, M. and Barrett, J.H. 2018 'The chronology of reindeer hunting on Norway's highest ice patches', Royal Society Open Science 5, 171738. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171738

Post-Melbye, J. and Rundberget, B. 2020 'En merovingertids blestersmed fra Storhov i Elverum' in C.L. Røndsrud and A. Mjærum (eds) Ingen vei utenom: Arkeologiske undersøkelser i forbindelse med etablering av ny rv. 3/25 i Løten og Elverum kommuner, Innlandet, Cappelen Damm Akademisk. 231-40. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.97

Ravn, M. 2014 'In defence of small things forgotten', Norwegian Archaeological Review 47(2), 205-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2014.943281

Riksantikvaren 2017 Retningslinjer. Privat bruk av metallsøker. https://ra.brage.unit.no/ra-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2479072/Guidelines_metal_detectors.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Last accessed: 31 May 2023].

Riksantikvaren 2020 18 May 'Vedrørendesøknader om privat bruk av metallsøkerpåautomatiskfredete kulturminner'. (20/04536).

Sand-Eriksen, A., Skre, D. and Stamnes, A.A. 2020 'Hvordan har metallgjenstander funnet veien til pløyelaget? Resultater fra et metodisk prøveprosjekt på Storhov i Elverum', Primitive tider 22, 75-94. https://doi.org/10.5617/pt.8395

Skre, D. and Pilø, L. 2016 20 February 'Metallsøkerdilemmaet', Klassekampen [website]. https://www.klassekampen.no/article/20160220/PLUSS/160229926 [Last accessed: 1 July 2023].

Tonning, C., Lie, R.O., Lia, V., Gabler, M. and Neubauer, W. 2017 'Er de alle løsfunn? Metallsøkfunn og potensialet for bevartkontekstunderpløyelaget', Viking 80, 223-43. https://doi.org/10.5617/viking.5481

Willems, W.J.H. 2012 'Problems with preservation in situ', Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 43/44, 1-8. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/20528 [Last accessed: 27 September 2024].

Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.

Terms and Conditions | Legal Statements | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Citing Internet Archaeology

Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.

Loading...