PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

6. Description and Analysis

The following types were established according to these criteria (the number in parenthesis refers to the number of known examples of that particular type):

Within these types, sub-types were distinguished by the spatial arrangement:

Sub-type 1: 1-room bar (20) Figure 5
Sub-type 1.H: 1-room bar attached to a house (12)Figure 6
Sub-type 2: 2-room bar (35)Figure 7
Sub-type 2.H: 2-room bar attached to a house (11)Figure 8
Sub-type 3: 3-room bar (28)Figure 9
Sub-type 4: large establishment (4 or more rooms) (46)Figure 10

The layouts of six properties that are buried by debris remain indeterminable.

To exemplify, this typology classifies the bar at I.2.29 - which had a counter with a cooking facility, a single room, and was attached to a house - as Type A.1.H (Figure 11). The property at VII.9.54-55 - which was without any facility for cooking and had three rooms - is classed as Type B.3 (Figure 12). The bar at I.19.2, because only minimal evidence is visible to suggest a counter once existed, and nothing else, is Type C (Figure 13).

Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13
Figure 11: Bar at I.2.29, Pompeii (Type A.1.H).
Figure 12: Bar at VII.9.54-55, Pompeii (Type B.3).
Figure 13: Bar at I.19.2, Pompeii (Type C).


 PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

© Internet Archaeology/Author(s) URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue24/4/6.html
Last updated: Mon Jun 30 2008