[Back] [Forward] [Contents] [Home]

12.3 Samian and shafts/wells and other watery environments

Wells, shafts and watery contexts are known to have been a locus of ritual artefact deposition through the Bronze and Iron Ages of north-west Europe (e.g. Ross 1967; Fitzpatrick 1984; Merrifield 1987; Bradley 1990; Hedeager 1992; Webster 1997) and hence examples from the context of Roman Britain should not be surprising. The symbolism of water and the apparent sacredness of water sources, channels, of marsh and intermittent water in the landscape, are evident from the nature of the archaeological record for the period; in some instances this was monumentalised with the construction of temples, etc, as at Bath. Samian vessels occur in structured deposits associated with water, and must have played a role in the activities undertaken at such locations. Some examples here demonstrate that they were often preferentially selected for inclusion within such deposits, possibly as offerings, perhaps sometimes related to feasting at these locations.

The specifically reported samian is: Central Gaulish, Lezoux, Drag. 18/31R, a second (apparent) Drag. 18/31R, Central Gaulish, Lezoux, Drag. 31 (x 4), Central Gaulish, Drag. 31 (x 1), probably Central Gaulish, Lezoux, Drag. 33 (x 2), Drag. 38, Central Gaulish, Lezoux, Drag. 45 (see Table 79 below). In addition four largely complete (reconstructable) glass vessels were represented comprising a jug, a large cup and two beakers (Wheeler and Wheeler 1936, 186, fig. 29). Clearly what this deposit represents is open to interpretation, though its composition suggests that it relates to feasting.

SamianAll Other Pottery
Beakers

-

8

Bowls

-

5

Small bowls

1

1

Colander

-

1

Cups

2

-

Dishes

7

9

Flagon

-

1

Jars

-

9

(Gritted) mortaria

1

1

Totals1135

Table 79: The composition of the pottery from the 'Well' in Room 5, Building 8, Insula IV, Verulamium
(on the basis of vessels reported/illustrated by Wheeler and Wheeler (1936) only, and so not a full list)

The above examples illustrate that in some instances, at least, samian was a prominent, selected, element within groups deposited in wells/shafts and other wet places in Britain. Waugh's comment when discussing the Chells deposit that notes, 'A discussion of the pottery alone is not enough to confirm the ritual or more mundane nature of the deposit in question ...' (1999, 102) is generally applicable: information needs to be considered in the round in each case.


[Back] [Forward] [Contents] [Home]

© Internet Archaeology URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue17/1/12.3.html
Last updated: Mon Mar 7 2005