The classes and variants identified in Trenches C and F were distributed throughout the stratigraphic sequence of each trench as shown in Tables 5–6 and Figures 35–36.
|Class/variants||Layer 1||Layer 2||Layer 3||Layer 4||Layer 5||Layer 6||Total|
|Class 1 variant 1||6||6||70||26||8||116|
|Class 1 variant 2||1||1|
|Class 1 variant 3||1||1|
|Class 2 variant 1||1||1||7||87||39||20||155|
|Class 2 variant 2||45||11||7||63|
|Class 2 variant 3||1||1||13||9||24|
|Class 2 variant 4||3||18||51||22||11||105|
|Class 2 variant 5||5||6||11|
|Class 2 variant 6||3||3|
|Class 3 variant 1|
|Class 3 variant 2||2||4||4||10|
|Class 5 variant 1||15||35||291||65||5||411|
|Class 5 variant 2||6||27||33|
|Class 5 variant 3||9||6||35||40||4||94|
|Class 5 variant 4||18||18|
|Class 6 variant 1||3||3|
|Class 6 variant 2||1||2||1||4|
|Class 6 variant 3||2||2|
|Class 7 variant 1||1||1|
|Class 7 variant 2||3||12||2||17|
|Class 10 variant 1||2||6||1||9|
|Class 10 variant 2||2||6||8|
|Class/variants||Layer 1||Layer 2||Layer 3||Layer 4||Layer 5||Layer 6||Layer 7||Layer 8||Total|
|Class 1 variant 1||5||6||33||3||12||56||60||13||188|
|Class 1 variant 2||3||3|
|Class 1 variant 3|
|Class 2 variant 1||6||8||33||3||18||39||40||12||159|
|Class 2 variant 2||5||9||36||2||15||16||16||9||108|
|Class 2 variant 3||1||1||4||6||6||2||20|
|Class 2 variant 4||11||9||38||5||49||44||19||13||188|
|Class 2 variant 5||2||4||3||1||10|
|Class 2 variant 6||1||1||1||1||1||5|
|Class 3 variant 1|
|Class 3 variant 2||2||8||41||6||16||8||9||1||91|
|Class 5 variant 1||19||22||61||19||79||109||92||28||429|
|Class 5 variant 2||15||13||21||9||28||29||115|
|Class 5 variant 3||86||158||398||137||299||140||4||6||1228|
|Class 5 variant 4||12||9||25||10||25||5||86|
|Class 6 variant 1||1||1||1||2||1||6|
|Class 6 variant 2||4||2||1||3||10|
|Class 6 variant 3||1||2||5||1||1||10|
|Class 7 variant 1||1||1||1||3|
|Class 7 variant 2||1||5||1||13||7||2||1||30|
|Class 10 variant 1||18||3||3||5||29|
|Class 10 variant 2||1||5||6|
As mentioned above, a number of samples from Trenches C and F were subjected to AMS dating (two from Trench C and six from Trench F) (Mohanty et al. in press). The resulting dates allow us to establish a tentative chrono-typology from the 4th century to the 10th century CE (Table 7).
|Trench||Layer||Radiocarbon date(s)||Date range|
|1||19th to 20th century|
|2||10th or post 10th century|
|3||10th or post 10th century|
|4||870-985||8th to 10th century|
|5||570-655||6th to 7th century|
|6||4th to 5th century|
|1||19th to 20th century|
|2||17th to 18th century|
|3||1719-1826||17th to 18th century|
|4||Post 10th century|
|5||1810-1924||7th to 10th century?|
|6||560-650/575-640||6th to 7th century|
|7||340-400/425-540||4th to 6th century|
|8||Pre 4th century|
|9||Pre 4th century|
The ease with which we can compare material from these trenches is constrained by the differing scale of excavations in each trench, varying quantities of ceramics in different contexts, and diverse degrees of certainty in the identification of archaeological layers between trenches. Notwithstanding these difficulties, it is possible to consolidate the ceramic counts for each of these trenches, and correlate the number of class-variants that were found to occur in the dated stratigraphic layers from those trenches. Doing so enables us to identify broad-scale distributions/concentrations of class variants by period, which can in turn be used as an indicator for the broad chronological phases that these class variants belong to (see Table 8). This leads us to propose a tentative chronological sequence for the entire assemblage.
|Class/variant||4th-6th century||6th-7th century||7th-10th century?||8th-10th century||17th-18th century|
|Class 1 var 1||35||25||2|
|Class 2 var 1||18||11||1||6||1|
|Class 2 var 2||4||8|
|Class 2 var 3||1||1||4|
|Class 2 var 4||9||11||1||2|
|Class 2 var 5||4|
|Class 3 var 2||3||2|
|Class 5 var 1||44||34||7||16|
|Class 5 var 2||1||1|
|Class 5 var 3||1||23||21||12|
|Class 5 var 4||1||1|
|Class 7 var 2||1||1||3|
|Class 10 var 1||2|
During the phase of occupation dating from the 4th to the 6th or 7th century CE, we observe that Class 1 variant 1, Class 2 variants 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and Class 5 variant 1 are dominant. In terms of vessel shapes, type 1 (the cup with thinned rim) is the most common type of Class 1 variant 1. For Class 2, necked jars with everted rims are the main shapes (Class 2 variant 1-types 9, 10, 11, 13; Class 2 variant 2-types 5, 6, 7). Bodysherds with impressed decoration are also present (Class 2 variant 5). The main shapes of Class 5 variant 1 are pots with an everted rim marked by an internal careen (Class 5 variant 1-types 8, 9, 10, 11). Pottery belonging to Class 9 is also present; however, this only amounts to a single potsherd. Potsherds belonging to Class 7 occur in all three dated phases, so it is difficult to use this class as a chronological marker.
Restrictive shapes are the most common vessel forms that occur across all classes and variants. Despite this, we also see a relatively high proportion of unrestrictive shapes in the form of a large number of cups made using pots belonging to Class 1 variant 1.
With the exception of vessels belonging to Class 9, which do not appear in layers belonging to this phase of occupation, the same classes and types from the previous phase continue to be dominant. In addition, Class 3 variant 2, Class 5 variants 2 and 3, and Class 10 also begin to appear in the assemblage. Interestingly, examples of Class 5 variant 2 occur in measurably lower frequencies than those of Class 5 variant 3.
In terms of vessel shapes, for Class 3 variant 2 pots with everted rims marked by an internal careen (e.g. Class 3 variant 2-type 5, similar to Class 5 variant 1-types 9, 10, and 11) are the most common forms. For Class 5 variant 3, vessels of shape-type 3 variant 2 (a bowl with an in-turned rim) and 8 (a necked-jar with out-turned rim and very often with an impressed and/or incised decoration on the top of the rim and a stamped decoration on the shoulder of the jar) are the most common forms.
The number of Class 5 variant 3 vessels increases and this becomes the main ware in the assemblage, while instances of Class 1, Class 2 and Class 5 variant 1 decrease significantly. Examples of Class 10 continue during this phase. Class 5 variant 2 also continues to be present but do not increase in quantity and appear in the same proportion as those of Class 5 variant 4, which also appears during this phase. Class 6 (all variants) also appears during this phase. Regarding the morphological types, we notice a greater variety of vessel shapes among pots of Class 5 variant 3. Yet, the shape-types 3 variant 2, 6 (a plate with a 'bord à marli'), 8, 14 variant 3 (a necked-jar), 15 (a necked-jar), and 16 variant 2 (a necked-jar) are the most common forms. Predominant vessel shapes in each of these phases are illustrated in Figure 37.
Other classes that are present in the assemblage from the earliest phase of occupation do not exhibit any differences in their morphology. As such, we are in a situation where it is the presence or absence and the relative proportions of each class and its variants that provide the most reliable chronological indicators. Other than Class 5 variant 3, we are unable to reconstruct an evolution of vessel forms within each class. The potsherds belonging to the Unidentified group have been discovered only in the upper layers of Trench C (dating to the post-10th century CE). This is also true for pots belonging to Class 5 variant 3, which can thus be considered chronological markers. The tentative chronological sequence made on the basis of the data from trenches C and F allows us to propose a relative dating for the layers of the other trenches.
Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.
Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.