Cite this as: Monckton, L. 2021 Public Benefit as Community Wellbeing in Archaeology, Internet Archaeology 57. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.57.12
This article outlines the theory and strategy behind Historic England's (HE) Wellbeing Strategy. It acknowledges the relevance of wellbeing to HE's core purpose, and proposes ways in which wellbeing can be built into archaeological and heritage projects. There is an evidenced link between access to heritage and wellbeing, which now needs to be better integrated into project design and implementation. The article concludes with an outline strategy for wellbeing-led projects, and a discussion of how the success of these projects could be evaluated.
Corresponding author: Linda Monckton
Figure 1: Our Wellbeing aims
Figure 2: The four domains of wellbeing and heritage in a proposed 2x2 matrix
Figure 3: An indicative example of the application of the four domains of wellbeing and heritage to an organisational portfolio
Figure 4: Indicative example of how the archaeological process at a simple level relates to the four 'domains'
Figure 5: An example of a wellbeing priority for heritage and archaeology taken from Historic England's draft strategy
Figure 6: Example of applying young people's interventions on the four domains in relation to the archaeological process
Figure 7: Likely critical success factors for working with young offenders
Figure 9: The Five Ways to Wellbeing based on source: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/mental-capital-and-wellbeing
Figure 10: A proposal for the Unique Selling Point of archaeology for delivering wellbeing
Figure 11: Important or critical factors in making the case for the benefit of wellbeing in archaeology
Figure 12: Stages on the journey to having wellbeing at the heart of what we do and five ways to drive an approach to achieve this
Ander, E., Thomson, L. Noble, G., Lanceley, A., Menon, U. and Chatterjee, H. 2013 'Heritage, health and well-being: assessing the impact of a heritage focused intervention on health and well-being', International Journal of Heritage Studies 19(3), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.651740
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 2010 Measuring Progress: Sustainable Development Indicators 2010. PDF
Everill, P., Bennett, R. and Burnell, K. 2020 'Dig in: an evaluation of the role of archaeological fieldwork for the improved wellbeing of military veterans', Antiquity 94(373), 212-27. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.85
Mapes, L.V. 2009 Breaking Ground: The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe and the Unearthing of the Tse-whit-zen Village, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Nimenko ,W. and Simpson, R.G. 2013 'Rear Operations Group medicine: a pilot study of psychological decompression in a Rear Operations Group during Operation HERRICK 14', BMJ Military Health 2014 160, 295-97. https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/160/4/295
Schaepe, D.M., Angelback, B., Snook, D. and Welch, J.R. 2017 'Archaeology as therapy: connecting belongings, knowledge, time, place, and well-being', Current Anthropology 58(4), 502-33. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692985
Sloane, B. 2021 'Making the Case for the Public Benefits of Development-led Archaeology', Internet Archaeology 57. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.57.17
Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.
Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.