Cite this as: Clarke, A. and Kirby, M. (with Alldritt, D. and Brown F.) 2022 Tuff, Flint, and Hazelnuts: Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Occupation at Netherhall Road, Maryport, Cumbria, Internet Archaeology 59. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.59.4
Evidence for Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic occupation at Maryport, Cumbria, was discovered during the excavation of Roman occupation features by CFA Archaeology Ltd. A varied lithic assemblage was recovered including worked flint (55%) and tuff (43%), with the rest consisting of a small amount of chert, chalcedony, and rhyolite. Early occupation, probably dating to the Final Palaeolithic Federmesser-Gruppen, is demonstrated through different technological styles among the lithic assemblage. Three phases of activity were identified from cut features and there was a significant amount of charred hazelnut shell, which gave radiocarbon dates centring around 8200 cal BCE.
This site provides the first clear evidence that tuff was exploited directly from sources in the Central Lake District, possibly as early as the Final Palaeolithic. The occupation evidence also demonstrates intensive processing of hazelnuts centring around 8200 cal BCE and lasting for 150–558 years. The dates and occupation span are almost identical to those derived from the Mesolithic structure at Cass ny Hawin 2 on the Isle of Man.
Correspondence contact: Melanie Johnson
CFA Archaeology Ltd, Musselburgh
Freelance specialist, North Berwick
Figure 1: Location map showing Mesolithic site relative to Roman-period features
Figure 2: Plan of Mesolithic features showing phases of activity
Figure 3: Prehistoric site post-excavation
Figure 4: Trench sections across Mesolithic site
Figure 5: Phase 1 and 2 features underlying colluvial deposits.
Figure 6: Sections through Phase 1 features
Figure 7: Sections through Phase 2 features
Figure 8: Phase 3 feature 452 cut through colluvial deposits
Figure 9: Composition of lithic assemblage. B - Blade; RF - Regular flake; FF/IF - Flake fragment/Irregular flake; SF - Small flake; Core - Cores and flaked/unflaked pebbles; Ret - Retouched tools; Chunk – Chunks
Figure 10: Proportions of raw materials used in assemblage
Figure 11: Amount of pebble cortex present on flint flakes and blades
Figure 12: Flint showing pebble cortex 105.308-16
Figure 13: Mottled blue/brown flint 105.299-303
Figure 14: Banded tuff 106.76
Figure 15: Fresh blue tuff 412. 1-18
Figure 16: Light abraded tuff L-R 106.80; 106.92; 105.65; 105.39
Figure 17: Abraded tuff L-R 105.41; 105.23; 106.65; 106.82; 459.1-2
Figure 18: Very abraded tuff L-R 105.85; 105.54; 106.81; 105.38; 105.87; 105.99
Figure 19: Carboniferous chert L group 514.31-3; R group 105.330-5
Figure 20: Chalcedonic material 105.328; 105.134
Figure 21: Cobble tool 106.WS14; Flint cores: Mottled blue brown flint 105.299-303; Pebble flint 106.22; 105.297; 106.21; 105.296; 456.1
Figure 22: Dimensions of cores and core fragments
Figure 23: Flint crested blade: 105.274; Tuff crested blades 486.6; 105.76; 106.65; 106.82; 456.6. Flint knife forms 105.276; 106.19. Tuff edge retouched 462.13
Figure 24: Tuff cores and core working
Figure 25: Dimensions of crested blades
Figure 26: Flint blade dimensions by phase
Figure 27: Tuff blade dimensions by phase
Figure 28: Retouched tools: Tuff edge retouched 105.124; Flint awl 105.65; Flint Awl/Burin 514.6. Chert cores 105.47-8.
Figure 29: Flint scrapers 105.305; 106.47; 520.1; 105.240; 456.4. Tuff end scrapers 486.10; 105.123. Flint backed points 106.109-10. Pieces 105.305 and 106.10 are broken at proximal end (not shown in illustration).
Figure 30: Tuff microliths: Microlith fragments 106.108; 105.120; 486.11; Partially backed 105.122; Point fragment 105.264; Obliquely blunted blades 105.118, 105.119. Flint microliths: Scalene triangle 106.16; Crescent 105.262; Microlith fragment 106.17; Partially backed 105.263; Backed blade 446.1.
Figure 31: Dimensions of tuff blades and surface alteration
Figure 32: Dimensions of tuff flakes and surface alteration
Figure 33: Context type and artefacts. B - Blade; RF - Regular flake; FF/IF - Flake fragment/Irregular flake; SF - Small flake; Core - Cores and flaked/unflaked pebbles; Ret - Retouched tools; Chunk - Chunks
Figure 34: Material use and context type
Figure 35: Material use by phase. Small flakes are represented separately from the other flaked lithics
Figure 36: Tuff blades and flakes by phase
Figure 37: Flint blades and flakes by phase
Figure 38: Proportions of flint and tuff by context type
Figure 39: Modelled radiocarbon sequence for Maryport, Cumbria
Figure 40: Duration of activity at Maryport, Cumbria
Figure 41: Duration of activity dated with charred hazelnut shell at Maryport, Cumbria and Cass ny Hawin 2, Isle of Man (CnH2)
Table 1: Composition of assemblage: B - Blade; RF - Regular flake; FF/IF - Flake fragment/Irregular flake; SF - Small flake; Core - Cores and flaked/unflaked pebbles; Ret - Retouched tools; Chunk - Chunks. See Appendix B for definitions.
Table 2: Types of retouched tools
Table 3: Summary of evidence for at least two different flaking industries
Table 4: Radiocarbon dates. Calibrated using OxCal v4.3.2 and the IntCal13 atmospheric calibration curve. Modelled dates (posterior densities) in italics
Table 5: Statistical significance of paired dates
Ashton, N. 2017 Early Humans, London.
Ballin, T.B., Saville, A., Tipping, R., Ward, T., Housley, R., Verrill, L., Bradley, M., Wilson, C., Lincoln, P. and Macleod, A. 2018 Reindeer Hunters at Howburn Farm, South Lanarkshire A Late Hamburgian Settlement in southern Scotland – its lithic artefacts and natural environment, Archaeopress Archaeology.
Bayliss, A., van der Plicht, J., Bronk Ramsey, C., McCormac, G., Healy, F. and Whittle, A. 2011 'Towards generational time-scales: the quantitative interpretation of archaeological chronologies' in A.W.R. Whittle, F.M.A. Healy and A. Bayliss (eds) Gathering Time: dating the Early Neolithic enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland, Oxford. 17-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dwp2.13
Bishop, R.R., Church, M.J. and Rowley-Conwy, P.A. 2009 'Cereals, fruits and nuts in the Scottish Neolithic', Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 139, 47-103. https://doi.org/10.9750/PSAS.139.47.103
Bradley, R. and Edmonds, M. 1993 Interpreting the Axe Trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain, Cambridge.
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995 'Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program', Radiocarbon 37(2), 425-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200030903
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1998 'Probability and dating', Radiocarbon 40, 461-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200018348
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001 'Development of the radiocarbon calibration program', Radiocarbon 43(2A), 355-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200038212
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009 'Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates', Radiocarbon 51(1), 337-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865
Brown, F., Clark, P., Dickson, A., Gregory, R.A. and Zant, J. in press a From an Ancient Eden to a New Frontier: an archaeological journey along the Carlisle Northern Development Route, Lancaster: Lancaster Imprints.
Brown, F., Evans, H. and Gregory, R.A. in press b Mesolithic Pioneers to Iron Age Warriors: settling the Isle of Man, Lancaster: Lancaster Imprints.
Cherry, J. and Cherry, B.A. 1983 'Prehistoric habitation sites in West Cumbria: Part I, The St Bees area and north to the Solway', Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society 83, 1-14.
Cherry, J. and Cherry, P.J. 1987 'Prehistoric habitation sites in West Cumbria. Part V: Eskmeals to Haverigg', Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society 87, 1-10.
Conneller, C. 2021 The Mesolithic in Britain, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003228103
Cowell, R.W. 2000 'The late prehistoric period in the North West' in R.W. Cowell and R.A. Philpott Prehistoric, Romano-British and medieval settlement in lowland North West England, National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside. 169-174.
Dickson, C. and Dickson, J.H. 2000 Plants and People in Ancient Scotland, Tempus.
French, D.H. 1971 'An experiment in water sieving', Anatolian Studies 21, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.2307/3642629
Heidenreich, S.M. 2008 'Late Glacial hunter-gatherers in Westphalia - the Final Palaeolithic site of Salzkotten-Thüle (District of Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany)', Archäologische Informationen 31(1&2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.11588/ai.2008.1&2
Hodgson, J. and Brennand, M. 2006 'Prehistoric Period Resource Assessment' in M. Brennand (ed) The Archaeology of North West England. An Archaeological Research Framework for the North West Region, Volume 1: Resource Assessment (Archaeology North West), Archaeology North West 18, Council for British Archaeology North-West. 23-58. https://images.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/2020-01/2.-the-prehistoric-period-resource-assessment-pdf.pdf
Kirby, M. forthcoming 'The excavation of a Romano-British site at Deer Park, Netherhall Road, Maryport', Internet Archaeology.
Lloyd, J.M., Shennan, I., Kirby, J.R. and Rutherford, M.M. 1999 'Holocene relative sea-level changes in the inner Solway Firth', Quaternary International 60(!), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00009-9
Lloyd, J.M., Yongqiang, Z., Fish, P. and Innes, J.B. 2013 'Holocene and Lateglacial relative sea-level change in north-west England: implications for glacial isostatic adjustment models', Journal of Quaternary Science 28(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2587
Mook, W.G. 1986 'Business meeting: recommendations/resolutions adopted by the twelfth International Radiocarbon Conference', Radiocarbon 28(2A), 799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200008043
Oxford Archaeology n.d. https://oxfordarchaeology.com/archaeology-case-studies/470-ronaldsway-mesolthic-hazelnuts [Last accessed: 27 April 2020]
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C.E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M. and van der Plicht, J. 2013 'IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0-50,000 years cal BP', Radiocarbon 55(4), 1869-87. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947
Saville, A. and Ballin, T.B. 2009 'Upper Palaeolithic evidence from Kilmelfort Cave, Argyll: a re-evaluation of the lithic assemblage', Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 139, 9–45.
Schweingruber, F.H. 1990 Anatomy of European Woods, Berne and Stuttgart: Paul Haupt Publishers.
Stace, C. 1997 New Flora of the British Isles, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press.
Stone, P., Millward, D., Young, B., Merrit, J.W., Clarke, S.M., McCormac, M. and Lawrence, D.J.D. 2010 British Regional Geology: Northern England, 5th edition, Keyworth, Nottingham: British Geological Survey.
Stuiver, M. and Kra, R.S. 1986 'Editorial comment', Radiocarbon 28(2B). https://doi.org/10.1017/S003382220006015X
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H.A. 1977 'Reporting of 14C data', Radiocarbon 19, 355-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200003672
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P.J. 1986 'A computer program for radiocarbon age calculation', Radiocarbon 28, 1022-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200060276
Ward, G.K. and Wilson, S.R. 1978 'Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique', Archaeometry 20, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1978.tb00208.x
Zohary, D. and Hopf, M. 2000 Domestication of Plants in the Old World, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press.
Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.
Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.