Cite this as: Novák, D., Staňková, V., Rýpar, V., Podliska, J. and Hasil, J. 2025 Managing the Urban Archaeological Heritage of Prague: The Benefits of Collaboration, Internet Archaeology 70. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.70.3
Prague, with its historical significance dating back over a millennium, has evolved into the focal point of the Czech state. The city's intricate development has not only resulted in the presence of distinctive archaeological remains, but has also secured its place on the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage List. The meticulous preservation of archaeological contexts, some of which are more than 10m deep, has been a sustained focus of various institutions since the establishment of Czechoslovakia in the early 20th century. Subsequently, the coordination of rescue and preventative archaeology has gained a pivotal role for the Prague Archaeological Commission, which was established in 1969 and has served as an advisory body to the Director of the National Heritage Institute in Prague since 1998. A key figure in the preservation effort was Ladislav Hrdlicka, based at the Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague. In the 1970s, he established the foundation for systematic documentation by creating the Map of Archaeological Documentation Points (MADB). The information systems derived from the MADB now form the foundation of Prague's archaeological monument conservation. From the 1990s onwards, the city of Prague introduced the Valuable Archaeological Areas (VAP) system, which identifies sites with exceptionally well-preserved archaeological terrain for enhanced protection within the Prague Heritage Reserve. Since 2017, data from MADB and VAP, in conjunction with other archaeological information, has been accessible through the Prague Archaeological portal. The portal was developed as a collaboration of the Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences with the National Heritage Institute. It constitutes a component of the archaeological information system of the Czech Republic. The digital integration of previously disparate yet high-quality data sources signifies a transformative shift in the management of Prague's archaeological heritage. Collaborations of the Prague Municipality Council and the Prague Institute of Planning and Development (the latter responsible for the preparation of planning analytical materials) have resulted in a significant reshaping of information flows between stakeholders. This has significantly enhanced the efficacy of decision-making processes for planning and implementation of development projects, making archaeological data an indispensable component of public debate on the city's historic core. Currently, Prague serves as a model for the implementation of comprehensive regulations for the protection of archaeological heritage throughout the Czech Republic, exemplifying a systematic and efficacious approach that can be emulated elsewhere.
Corresponding author: David Novák
novak@arup.cas.cz
Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague
Veronika Staňková
stankova.veronika@npu.cz
National Heritage Institute
Vít Rýpar
rypar@ipr.praha.eu
Prague Institute of Planning and Development
Jaroslav Podliska
podliska.jaroslav@npu.cz
National Heritage Institute
Jan Hasil
hasil@arup.cas.cz
Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague
Figure 1: The historic centre of Prague: the view from Prague Castle (Photo: J. Podliska, 2015).
Figure 2: The historic centre of Prague: the extent of the urban heritage reserve (©National Heritage Institute, 2024).
Figure 3: Prague Old Town, south-western part. Reconstruction of settlement progression across the valley based on archaeological documentation point (ADB) elevation data. 1, bedrock; 2, sandy gravels; 3, flood sediments; 4, Holocene fill; 5, diluvium; 6–8, 9th–12th-century strata; 9, 13th–14th-century strata; 10, water table. Elevations in the Adriatic system. The thickness of layers 6–8 has been schematically increased for illustration (Hrdlička 2009, 10).
Figure 4: Prague Old Town, Karlova Street with wider surroundings. Original analogue map of the Archaeological Documentation Points (ADB). 1, documentation points up to 2×2 m; 2, sections longer than 2 m and areas > 2×2 m; 3, events located approximately (with a maximum assumed tolerance of 25 m); 4, events not precisely located (assumed tolerance of 250 m); 5, geological boreholes and dug probes; 6, buildings (Hrdlička 2009, 12).
Figure 5: The location of Valuable Archaeological Areas (VAPs) in the historic centre of Prague, after the last update (© National Heritage Institute, 2024).
Figure 6: Prague New Town, Charles Square. A confluence of documents for defining the archaeological potential of a Valuable Archaeological Area (VAP) based on archival, iconographic and archaeological sources and finds. (A) Detail from F. A. L. Herget's plan, year 1791 (AMP MAP P 1 B/1) and current parcellation. (B) Indication of archaeological excavations and modern underground structures as of 2023: 1, buildings; 2, first basement level; 3, square area; 4, archaeological excavations; 5, geological documentation points; 6, metro station underground vestibule; 7, utility networks. (C) Reconstruction of historical settlement and destroyed buildings within the Charles Square area: A–K, destroyed buildings; 1, residential buildings; 2, VAP No. 123; 4, destroyed construction components; 4, fire reservoir; 6, settlement before the establishment of Charles Square in 1348; 6, historical burial sites and cemeteries; 7, former watercourses and drainage channels; 8, historical sewage system; 9, former water sources; 10, prehistoric settlement (© National Heritage Institute, 2024).
Figure 7: The Valuable Archaeological Area (VAP) of Charles Square (VAP No. 123) and its changes during the revisions from 1999 to 2021 (© National Heritage Institute, 2024).
Figure 8: Archaeological Documentation Point description in the Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic (AMCR) system. See also the public presentation at https://digiarchiv.aiscr.cz/id/ADB-PRAH71-007398 (© Archaeological Information System of the Czech Republic, 2024).
Figure 9: The typical lifecycle of archaeological data in the Prague Heritage Reserve (© Archaeological Information System of the Czech Republic, 2024).
Figure 10: A comprehensive overview of the frequency and structure of archaeological finds in Prague based on the Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic (AMCR) data (© Prague Institute of Planning and Development, 2024).
Figure 11: An example of land-use limits as defined in the Planning Analytical Materials (PAMs) (© Prague Institute of Planning and Development, 2024).
Figure 12: An assessment of conflicts between land-use limits and intentions. (A) Delimitation of intentions for land-use changes (i.e. in this example sewer collector K-TK-0053). (B) Problems to be solved (i.e. in this example the identified obstacle OZL-101) (© Prague Institute of Planning and Development, 2024)
AMP MAP P 1 B/1, Prague City Archives, Sign. MAP P 1 B/1, Grundris der Kay. König. HauptStadt Prag im Königreich Böhmen unter ... Leopold des II. 1791.
Boháčová, I. and Podliska, J. 2015 'Praha archeologická: koncepce a realizace projektu Integrovaného informačního systému archeologických pramenů Prahy', Archaeologia historica 40, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.5817/AH2015-1-2
Boháčová, I. and Podliska, J. 2020a 'Archeologie v Praze po vzniku ČSR (1918–1948): Počátky a organizace moderního výzkumu města', in M. Neumann and J. Mellnerová Šuteková (eds) Dejiny archeológie: Archeológia v Československu v rokoch 1918–1948. Studia archeologica et mediaevalia, tomus XIV. Bratislava. 315–355.
Boháčová, I. and Podliska, J. 2020b 'Archeologie středověku v Praze mezi dvěma světovými válkami – zapomenuté kapitoly z historie oboru', Archaeologia historica 45, 641–982. https://doi.org/10.5817/AH2020-2-6.]
Boháčová, I., Podliska, J. and Hasil, J. 2015 'Down to the trenches: the Integrated Information System of Archaeological Sources of Prague – an adjustment to the AMCR for urban archaeology' in M. Kuna, J. Hasil, D. Novák et al. (eds) Structuring Archaeological Evidence: The Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic and Related Information Systems. Prague: Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. 99–113. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11220286
Boháčová, I., Podliska, J. et al. 2018 Průvodce pražskou archeologií. Památky známé, neznámé i skryté, 2. upravené vydání, Praha.
Cikán, M. and Sedlák, J. 2021 Management Plan for Conservation of world Cultural Heritage of the Historic Centre of Prague. Part 001, Prague.
Havrda, J. 2021 'Pražská aglomerace na přelomu 9. a 10. Století', in J. Mařík, M. Musílek and P. Sommer (eds) Svatá Ludmila: Žena na rozhraní věků, Praha. 94–102.
Herichová, I., Hrdlička, L., Křivánková, D. and Kuna, M. 2009 Databáze ADB (archeologických dokumentačních bodů): Rozšiřující modul Archeologické databáze Čech v. 3.1. pro území Prahy, Uživatelská příručka. Praha.
Hrdlička, L. 2009 Praha: Databáze podrobné mapy archeologických dokumentačních bodů na území Pražské památkové rezervace (aktualizace k 31.12.2005), Praha.
Kuna, M., Novák, D., Hasil, J. and Křivánková, D. 2017 'Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic. Current state and future visions of virtual research tools in the Czech Republic', Internet Archaeology 43. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.43.10
MMR 2022 Spatial Planning and Building Rules, Prague: The Ministry of Regional Development (Ministry of Regional Development). https://mmr.gov.cz/en/ministerstvo/spatial-planning-and-building-rules
NHI 2020–2021 Významné archeologické plochy v Pražské památkové rezervaci: Prevence a ochrana (revize 2020), NPÚ-311/3976/2022, Prague: National Heritage Institute (NHI). https://www.archeopraha.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Vyznamne-Plochy-2020.pdf
Novák, D., Kuna, M. and Lecbychová, O. 2021 'Taming the beast. Approaches to digital archiving in Czech archaeology', Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.5
Novák, D., Oniszczuk, A., Tsang, C., Gumbert, B., de Langhe, K. and Watson, J. 2024 Revisiting the Valletta Convention for the Digital Age: Position Statement on Archiving Primary Archaeological Data, EAC Guidelines 6. Brussels: European Archaeological Council (EAC). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10695890
Podliska, J. and Tomášek, M. 2014 'Na okraj archeologické památkové péče', Zprávy památkové péče 74, 246–250.
Podliska, J. and Tryml, M. 2012 'Ochrana archeologických památek v Pražské památkové rezervaci', Zprávy památkové péče 72, 100–105.
Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.
Terms and Conditions | Legal Statements | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Citing Internet Archaeology
Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.