Table 36 and Figs.63-4 illustrate the relative abundance of the three major domesticates. These data demonstrate the problems caused by variations in different methods of quantification. The NISP shows cattle to be the most abundant, while calculations of the MNI suggests that there is more caprovid material. This discrepancy can be explained in two ways. Firstly, the NISP for cattle is inflated by the large numbers of first phalanges. This may be a reflection of differential preservation (this bone is compact and durable) or of some specialist carcass utilisation. The MNI is, in all cases, based upon mandibles. This again may be biased by the relative durability of caprovid mandibles and the potential economic value of cattle mandibles (Dobney et al. 1996a, 25). Table 37 shows that there is no significant change in the relative frequency of the species represented between Phases 1 and 2.
Species | NISP | NISP % | MNI | MNI % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cattle | 215 | 57 | 12 | 26 |
Caprovid | 143 | 38 | 28 | 61 |
Pig | 20 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
Fig.63: Welton Road, Brough: frequency of the main domesticates using NISP counts
Fig.64: Welton Road, Brough: frequency of the main domesticates using MNI counts
Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % |
Cattle | 94 | 56 | 121 | 52 | 215 | 54 |
Caprovid | 55 | 32 | 88 | 38 | 143 | 36 |
Pig | 10 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 20 | 5 |
Horse | 7 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 17 | 4 |
Dog | 1 | 0.6 | 2 | 0.8 | 3 | 0.75 |
Roe deer | 1 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2 |
The remaining mammalian species represented in the assemblage are horse (17 fragments), dog (three fragments) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus (L.) (one fragment). In terms of the NISP, these three species represent only 5% of the total analysed sample (Table 38 and Figure 65).
Element | Cattle | Caprovid | Pig | Horse | Dog | Roe deer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horncore | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
Mandible | 22 | 50 | 8 | - | - | - |
Scapula | 4 | 6 | - | 4 | 1 | - |
Humerus | 9 | 10 | 2 | - | - | - |
Radius | 4 | 4 | 2 | - | 1 | - |
Metacarpal | 16 | 4 | - | 3 | - | - |
Pelvis | 6 | 10 | 1 | - | - | - |
Femur | 1 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - |
Tibia | 6 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Metatarsal | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
Metapodial | 1 | 2 | - | 1 | - | - |
Calcaneum | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
Astragalus | 15 | 4 | - | 1 | - | - |
Phalanx 1 | 78 | 5 | 2 | 4 | - | - |
Phalanx 3 | 18 | - | - | - | - | - |
M3 | 4 | 2 | - | - | - | - |
Dp4 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | |
Total | 215 | 143 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 1 |
Fig.65: Welton Road, Brough: frequency of all the identified species
© Internet Archaeology
URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue9/brough/eaurep2.html
Last updated: Tue Nov 28 2000