PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

Table of Figures

Figure 1: The map of van der Monde (1844-46) which stands at the basis of the map-regression of Utrecht.

Figure 2: Plan of Utrecht in 1846, based on the map of van der Monde

Figure 3: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1000

Figure 4: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1150

Figure 5: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1200

Figure 6: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1300

Figure 7: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1400

Figure 8: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1550

Figure 9: Plan of Utrecht in AD 1846

Figure 10: Plan of Utrecht in AD 2005

Figure 11: Axial all line map section

Figure 12: Axial fewest line map section

Figure 13: ASA map section

Figure 14: Location of Utrecht in the centre of The Netherlands

Figure 15: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Asa Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 16: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Asa Global Mean Depth

Figure 17: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Asa Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 18: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Asa Local Mean Depth

Figure 19: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Axial Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 20: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Axial Global Integration

Figure 21: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Axial Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 22: Analysis of Utrecht in 1300: Axial Local Integration

Figure 23: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Asa Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 24: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Asa Global Mean Depth

Figure 25: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Asa Local Choice (red + 1)

Figure 26: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Asa Local Mean Depth (red + 1)

Figure 27: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Axial Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 28: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Axial Global Integration

Figure 29: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Axial Local Choice (red + 1)

Figure 30: Analysis of Utrecht in 1400: Axial Local Integration

Figure 31: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Asa Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 32: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Asa Global Mean Depth (red + 2)

Figure 33: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Asa Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 34: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Asa Local Mean Depth (red + 4)

Figure 35: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Axial Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 36: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Axial Global Integration

Figure 37: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Axial Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 38: Analysis of Utrecht in 1550: Axial Local Integration

Figure 39: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Asa Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 40: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Asa Global Mean Depth (red + 2) blue plus 1

Figure 41: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Asa Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 42: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Asa Local Mean Depth (red + 4)

Figure 43: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Axial Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 44: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Axial Global Integration (red + 1)

Figure 45: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Axial Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 46: Analysis of Utrecht in 1846: Axial Local Integration (red + 1)

Figure 47: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Asa Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 48: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Asa Global Mean Depth (blue + 2)

Figure 49: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Asa Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 50: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Asa Local Mean Depth

Figure 51: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Axial Global Choice (red + 2)

Figure 52: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Axial Global Integration (red + 1)

Figure 53: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Axial Local Choice (red + 2)

Figure 54: Analysis of Utrecht in 2005. Axial Local Integration

Figure 55: Location of Utrecht's economic spaces in AD 1200

Figure 56: Location of Utrecht's economic spaces in AD 1400


 PREVIOUS   NEXT   CONTENTS   HOME 

© Internet Archaeology / Author URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue21/5/tof.html
Last updated: Wed Aug 8 2007