Table 1: The Composition of Database: showing the nature of the available sample. (Section 5.2.4)
Table 2: The Representation of Stamps amongst Samian Assemblages by number of samian sherds. (Section 5.3.1)
Table 3: The Representation of Stamps amongst Samian Assemblages by number of samian vessels. (Section 5.3.1)
Table 4: Ratios between Samian Form Types within Groups: Some Potential Indicators of Broad Chronology. (Section 5.3.2.2)
Table 5: The Relative Proportions of Drag. 29 and Drag. 37 Decorated Samian bowls amongst Stratified Groups during the second half of the First Century and beginning of the Second Century AD. Groups arranged by Site Type and latest Date of Deposition.
Table 6: The Relative Proportions of Drag. 29 and Drag. 37 Decorated Samian bowls amongst Stratified Groups during the second half of the First Century and beginning of the Second Century AD. Arranged by Site Type and medial date, showing Calibration.
Table 7: References relating to Tables 5 and 6.
Table 8: Samian and the Date of Site Deposits. Case Study 1, Southwark: The Bonded Warehouse, Montague Close, 1974, Roadside activities and structural remains (SLAEC 1978).
Table 9: Samian and the Date of Site Deposits. Case Study 2, Southwark: 93-5 Borough High St, 1974, Water channel deposits (SLAEC 1978).
Table 10: The Relative Frequency of Samian by Source per Year amongst the Sample of Site Groups. (Table 10 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 11: Summary of early (pre-c. AD 120) Lezoux samian vessels in Britain by Site Type and Form. (Section 6.4.4)
Table 12 Incidence of Montans Samian in Britain by Date and Form. (Table 12 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 13: Summary of Montans vessels in Britain by Site Type and Form. (Section 6.6.4)
Table 14 Percentages formed by Montans Vessels amongst Samian Assemblages at Various Sites, by Stratified / Dated Group (quantification by number of vessels represented). (Table 14 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 15 Percentages formed by Montans Sherds amongst Samian Assemblages at Various Sites, by Stratified / Dated Group (quantification by numbers of sherds).(Table 15 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 16: The Relative Frequency of Montans Samian amongst Ceramic Phase Assemblages from London by Weight (excluding amphorae). (Section 6.6.5)
Table 17: The Relative Frequency of Montans Samian amongst Ceramic Phase Assemblages from London by EVE (excluding amphorae). Source of raw data: Davies et al. 1994. (Section 6.6.5)
Table 18: The Presence of East Gaulish Samian amongst a selection of Site Assemblages from Britain. (Section 6.7.3)
Table 19: Summary of the East Gaulish Samian from Birdoswald Spur, EH Site 590 (Source: Willis forthcoming F). (Section 6.7.3)
Table 20: Averaged Percentages of Samian by weight within Stratified Pottery Groups from Different Site Types, First and Second Centuries AD, based on the Sample published as Table 1 (Willis 1998a).
Table 21: Samian as a Percentage within Stratified Pottery Groups by Weight: Number of Samples Collected by Site Type, 1998 and 2003. (Section 7.2.1)
Table 22: Samian as a Percentage within Stratified Pottery Groups by EVE: Number of Samples Collected by Site Type, 1998 and 2003. (Section 7.2.1)
Table 23: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by Weight (excluding amphorae), arranged by Site Type and Alphabetically.
Table 24: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by Weight (excluding amphorae), arranged by Site Type and in Chronological order.
Table 25: References relating to Tables 23 and 24.
Table 26: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by Weight, including amphorae.
Table 27: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by EVE (excluding amphorae), arranged by Site Type and Alphabetically.
Table 28: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by EVE (excluding amphorae), arranged by Site Type and in Chronological order.
Table 29: References relating to Tables 27 and 28.
Table 30: Heybridge, Elms Farm, Essex, 1993-5: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by Weight (exc. amphora).
Table 31: Heybridge, Elms Farm, Essex, 1993-5: Samian as a Percentage within Pottery Groups by EVE (exc. amphora).
Table 32: Averaged Percentages of Samian by weight within Stratified Pottery Groups from Different Site Types, based on Tables 23 and 24. (Section 7.2.8)
Table 33: Averaged Percentages of Samian by EVE within Stratified Pottery Groups from Different Site Types, based on Tables 27 and 28. (Section 7.2.8)
Table 34: Averaged Percentages of Decorated Vessels within Site Samian Groups from Different Site Types in Britain, first and second centuries AD, based on the sample published in Table 3, 1998 (Willis 1998a). (On basis of quantification by number of vessels). (Section 7.3.2)
Table 35: Percentages of Decorated Vessels amongst Samian Assemblages at Various Site Types by Stratified Group and Dated Group (quantification by number of vessels represented).
Table 36: References relating to Table 35.
Table 37: Percentages of Decorated Vessels amongst Samian Assemblages at Various Sites, by Samian Fabric Type independent of phase (quantification by number of vessels represented).
Table 38: References relating to Table 37.
Table 39: Percentages of Decorated Vessels amongst Samian Assemblages at Various Sites, by broad Date of the Samian Pottery, where only data to this level is available (quantification by number of vessels represented).
Table 40: References relating to Table 39.
Table 41: Decorated Samian as a Percentage within Stratified Samian Groups: Number of Samples Collected by Site Type, 1998 and 2003.
Table 42: Averaged Percentages of Decorated Vessels within Site Samian Groups from Different Site Types in Britain, first and second centuries AD, based on the sample collected during Phases 1 and 2 of this Project. (On basis of quantification by number of vessels).
Table 43 (table in xl spreadsheet format): Summary Table of the Incidence of Samian at Different Types of Site by Generic/Functional Category: showing Aggregate Raw Values.
Table 44 (table in xl spreadsheet format): Summary Table of the Incidence of Samian at Different Types of Site by Generic/Functional Category: showing the frequency of each Functional Category between the Different Types of Site (cf. Table 43).
Table 45: Summary of the overall Relative Frequency of Different Samian Functional Categories at Different Site Types (cf. Table 43).
Table 46: The Composition of the Samian from the fill of The Vallum at Birdoswald Spur (Site 590, Site Phase 1), dated c. AD 125/130-150/160. Numbers record the count of vessels represented, attributable to categories; Source: Willis forthcoming F. (Section 8.2.2)
Table 47: The Composition of the Samian from the area of the vicus at Brancaster, Norfolk, 1974 and 1977, dated c. AD 140-260+. Numbers record the count of vessels represented, attributable to categories; Source: Dickinson and Bird 1985. (Section 8.2.3)
Table 48: The overall Relative Frequency of Samian Types at Smaller Civil Centres in the year AD 160.
Table 49: The Composition of the Samian from The Old Sugar Beet Works site, Felsted, Essex, 1998 (AC 210), dated c. AD 40/70-200/250. Numbers record the count of vessels represented, attributable to categories; Source: Willis 1999a.
Table 50: The Composition of the Samian from the Field Study Centre site, Birdoswald fort, c. AD 100-260+. Numbers record the EVE count (by Rim Equivalent) for categories; Source: Willis forthcoming F.
Table 51: The Composition of the South Gaulish Samian from Metchley, Birmingham, dated c. AD 40-110. Numbers record the EVE count (by Rim Equivalent) for categories; Source: Willis forthcoming J.
Table 52: The Composition of the Samian from Hayton, Burnby Lane, East Yorkshire, dated c. AD 70-260+. Numbers record the EVE count (by Rim Equivalent) for categories; Source: Willis forthcoming G.
Table 53: The Representation of Cup Forms amongst some South Gaulish Samian collections from Essex
Table 54: The Representation of Cup Forms amongst some Central Gaulish Samian collections from Essex
Table 55: Samian Mortaria amongst dated Samian Groups and Assemblages.
Table 56: Samian Mortaria amongst dated Samian Groups and Assemblages: Details of Typology.
Table 57: The Incidence of the Samian Flagon Stanfield (1929) Form 67 in Britain (Source: Appendix 8.3).
Table 58: Incidence of Interior Wear on Samian Vessels by Form.
Table 59: Summary of the Frequency of Graves with Samian by Site Type. (Section 9.4)
Table 60: The Frequency of Samian Vessels within Graves, expressed as the Percentage of the Graves with Pottery which include Samian Vessels; arranged by associated Site Type and Chronologically.
Table 61: Samian Vessels from Graves at 4 Cemetery Environments associated with Major Civil Centres by Fabric, Form and Generic/Functional Type (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 82; source Appendix 9.1).
Table 62: Samian Vessels from Graves at 9 Cemetery Environments associated with Smaller Civil Centres by Fabric, Form and Generic/Functional Type (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 68; source Appendix 9.1).
Table 63: Samian Vessels from Graves at 17 Cemetery Environments associated with Rural Sites / Locations by Fabric, Form and Generic/Functional Type (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 57; source Appendix 9.1).
Table 64: Samian Vessels from Graves at 4 Cemetery Environments associated with Major Civil Centres by Generic/Functional Type and Date (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 79; source: see Table 61).
Table 65: Samian Vessels from Graves at 9 Cemetery Environments associated with Smaller Civil Centres by Generic/Functional Type and Date (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 66; source: see Table 62).
Table 66: Samian Vessels from Graves at 15 Cemetery Environments associated with Rural Sites / Locations by Generic/Functional Type and Date (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 50; source: see Table 63).
Table 67: Samian Vessels as Grave Goods: The Incidence of Samian Vessels in Graves by Source and Generic Form at a Sample of 30 Cemetery Environments from 8 County Districts (N = 207). (Table 67 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 68: Samian Vessels as Grave Goods: Summary of the Incidence of Samian Vessels in Graves by Source and Generic Form at a Sample of 30 Cemetery Environments (N = 207).(Table 68 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 69: The Composition of the Sample of Samian from 30 Cemetery Environments by Fabric, Form and Generic/Functional Type (ie. the number of vessels represented attributable to a specific category; N = 207).
Table 70: Numbers of Smaller and Larger Samian Vessels in Graves amongst the sample of 30 cemetery environments documented in Appendix 9.1. (Section 9.8)
Table 71: Summary of the Incidence of Coarse Pottery, Glass and Samian (by sherd count) from selected locations within the fort at Segontium, 1975-9 (Source: King and Millett 1993, Table 16.9).
Table 72: Incidence of Repaired Samian Vessels by Type.
Table 73: Frequency of Repaired Vessels amongst Samian Assemblages at Various Site Types, by Stratified / Dated Group (quantification by number of vessels represented).(Table 73 is available here as a .xls spreadsheet allowing data to be used by the reader)
Table 74: References relating to Table 73. (.xls spreadsheet file)
Table 75: Summary of the Incidence of Repaired Samian Vessels in Britain by Form and Site Type (Source: Table 72; each record is an individual vessel; data excludes items associated with burials). (Section 11.6)
Table 76: Comparison of the Relative Frequency of Repaired Samian Forms at Military Sites (N = 32), with the Relative Frequency of the main Forms at these Sites (N = 41 Dated Site Groups). (Section 11.6)
Table 77: Comparison of the Relative Frequency of Repaired Samian Forms at Smaller Civil Centres (N = 27), with the Relative Frequency of the main Forms at these Sites(N = 32 Dated Site Groups). (Section 11.6)
Table 78: Comparison of the Relative Frequency of Repaired Samian Forms at Rural Sites (N = 18), with the Relative Frequency of the main Forms at these Sites (N = 28 Dated Site Groups). (Section 11.6)
Table 79: The Composition of the Pottery from the 'Well' in Room 5, Building 8, Insula IV, Verulamium (on the basis of vessels reported/illustrated by Wheeler and Wheeler (1936) only, and so not a full list). (Section 12.3)
Table 80: Sum of all data values in the Samian Database by year and type (ie. sum of all raw values amongst the 179 site spreadsheets/Database 1). (.xls spreadsheet file).
Table 81: The overall incidence of types represented in the Samian Database expressed as percentages per year (Source: raw values of Table 80). (.xls spreadsheet file).